Skip to content

Kluwer Mediation Blog

Kluwer Mediation Blog
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
By Dorcas Quek Anderson
Singapore Management University
Website
Commercial Mediation, Developing the Field, EU Directive on Mediation, EU Mediation Directive, Future of mediation, Growth of the Field (Challenges, New Sectors, etc.), International Law, International Mediation, Legal Issues, Legal Practice, mediated settlement agreement, Mediation Outcomes, Mediation Practice, Mediation Reforms (Legislation, etc.), New York Convention, Policy, Reform, Regulation, UN and International Organizations, UNCITRAL

UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 4

Anna Howard (Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London), Nadja Alexander (Editor) (Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy), and Dorcas Quek Anderson (Singapore Management University)/September 23, 2016September 23, 2016 /Leave a comment

“…the mounting global hubbub surrounding mediation, and highly varied perceptions regarding the nature and value of mediation, underscore the need for thoughtful conversation and deliberate reflection on present trends and tendencies. The failure to periodically step back and take stock of where we are and where we are going increases the likelihood of behavioural ‘drift’…

Continue reading
Commercial Mediation, Developing the Field, Future of mediation, Growth of the Field (Challenges, New Sectors, etc.), International commercial mediation, International Law, International Mediation, Legal Issues, Legal Practice, mediated settlement agreement, Mediation Outcomes, Mediation Reforms (Legislation, etc.), New York Convention, Policy, Reform, UNCITRAL

UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 3

Dorcas Quek Anderson (Singapore Management University), Nadja Alexander (Editor) (Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy), and Anna Howard (Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London)/September 22, 2016September 22, 2016 /Leave a comment

If you have been following this four-part series, you will be aware that Nadja Alexander, Anna Howard and I have been reflecting on a very current subject for the dispute resolution community: the enforceability of international commercial settlement agreements resulting from mediation. This week, the UNCITRAL Working Group II on arbitration and conciliation has been…

Continue reading
Commercial Mediation, Conciliation, Developing the Field, Future of mediation, Growth of the Field (Challenges, New Sectors, etc.), International commercial mediation, International Law, International Mediation, Legal Issues, Legal Practice, mediated settlement agreement, Mediation Outcomes, Mediation Reforms (Legislation, etc.), New York Convention, Policy, Reform, Settlement Agreements, UN and International Organizations, UNCITRAL

UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 2

Dorcas Quek Anderson (Singapore Management University), Nadja Alexander (Editor) (Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy), and Anna Howard (Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London)/September 21, 2016September 22, 2016 /2 Comments

The 65th session of the UNCITRAL Working Group II on arbitration and conciliation in Vienna has commenced. Many mediators have been keenly monitoring the Working Group’s deliberations and discussions concerning the enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements resulting from conciliations (iMSAs). An unresolved but crucial question is the exact form that the final instrument should take….

Continue reading
Conciliation, Developing the Field, Enforcement of a Mediation Clause, Enforcement of an ADR Clause, Future of mediation, Growth of the Field (Challenges, New Sectors, etc.), International commercial mediation, International Law, International Mediation, Legal Issues, Legal Practice, Mediation Outcomes, Mediation Reforms (Legislation, etc.), National Mediation Laws, New York Convention, Regulation, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Model Law

UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up

Nadja Alexander (Editor) (Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy), Anna Howard (Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London), and Dorcas Quek Anderson (Singapore Management University)/September 19, 2016September 19, 2016 /1 Comment

As the 65th session of the UNCITRAL Working Group II on arbitration and conciliation nears, it seems timely to reflect on the issues likely to be discussed and debated in Vienna this week. In this post, I focus on the legitimacy of a proposed multilateral convention on the recognition and enforceability of international mediated settlement…

Continue reading

Newsletter

Browse categories

Wolters Kluwer
10080815-0001_OR2_290EU Cross-Border Commercial Mediation: Listening to Disputants - Changing the Frame; Framing the ChangesBy Anna Howard€ 93
10073406-0001_OR2_290The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A CommentaryBy Nadja Alexander & Shouyu Chong€ 160
10059046-0001_280Essays on Mediation: Dealing with Disputes in the 21st CenturyEdited by Ian Macduff€ 160

Contributors

  • Nadja Alexander (Editor)
    Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy
  • Bill Marsh (Editor)
    Bill Marsh Mediator
  • Janet Checkley (Assistant Editor)
    Microsoft Asia
  • Juhi Gupta (Assistant Editor)
    Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.
  • Paul Sills (Assistant Editor)
    Paul Sills Mediator & Barrister
  • Constantin-Adi Gavrila
    ADR Center Romania
  • Greg Bond
    Bond & Bond Mediation / University of Wildau
  • Anna Howard
    Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London
  • Rosemary Howell
    University of New South Wales
  • Charlie Irvine
    University of Strathclyde
  • Ting-Kwok IU
    Kwok, Ng & Chan, Solicitors & Notaries
  • Tatiana Kyselova
    Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine
  • Joel Lee
    National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law
  • Alan Limbury
    Strategic Resolution
  • Andrea Maia
    Mediar360 - Dispute Resolution
  • Ian Macduff
    NZ Centre for ICT Law & School of Law, Auckland University
  • Rafal Morek
    DWF LLP
  • Geoff Sharp
    Brick Court Chambers / Clifton Chambers
  • John Sturrock
    Core Solutions Group
  • Martin Svatoš
    FORARB/Charles University
  • Sophie Tkemaladze
    Resolve / New Vision University
  • Sabine Walsh
    Sabine Walsh Mediation
  • Rick Weiler
    Weiler ADR Inc.
  • Charlie Woods
    Core Solutions Group / Scottish Universities Insight Institute

Affiliates

  • Young Mediators Initiative (YMI)
    Members
    Young Mediators Initiative (YMI)

Related Sites

  • Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Author Portal

RSS Feeds

Summary Feed Article Feed

Kluwer Arbitration rock

Kluwer Logo

About us

  • About Kluwer Mediation Blog
  • Kluwer Arbitration
  • Kluwer Law International
  • E-store
  • Authors

Legal policy

  • User Agreement and Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies

Contact

  • General Information
Back to top